Fixed as suggested.
No regression test included because this is a doc comment only change.

 xxxxx@xxxxx  2002-09-28

java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.0-C)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.0-C, mixed mode)


There is a specific documentation bug in the documentation for
com.sun.javadoc.Doc.inlineTags() and com.sun.javadoc.Doc.firstSentenceTags().

Doc comment for both methods says:
"...Inline tags are represented as a SeeTag of kind "link"..."

Firstly, the term "kind" is undefined -- assuming it is the
com.sun.javadoc.Tag.kind() method.

Assuming that the term "kind" refers to the Tag.kind() method metioned above:
The comment is then incorrect. A SeeTag representing an inline {@link ...} tag
has kind() equal to "@see", just like your average SeeTag does.
The method that is meant by this cryptic doc comment is, I believe, Tag.name().
This returns "@see" for a SeeTag representing a '@see' doc comment, and
returns "@link" for a SeeTag representing a '{@link ...}' doc comment.

Even by correcting the term "kind" to "Tag.name()", the comment would be
incorrect, because the return value of both Tag.kind() and Tag.name() contains
the '@' symbol, although the comment above implies the opposite, namely that
the '@' symbol is omitted!
(Review ID: 131811) 
======================================================================

Write a few toy doclets. Play around until it sits straight in your head.
======================================================================

Changed synopsis from:
  Specific documentation bug in com.sun.javadoc.Doc

  Doclet API: misleading documentation for com.sun.javadoc.Doc