|
Quick Lists
|
|
Bug ID:
|
4749707
|
|
Votes
|
0
|
|
Synopsis
|
stddoclet: Should include version number (and build) in generated HTML comment
|
|
Category
|
doclet:tbd
|
|
Reported Against
|
1.4.1
|
|
Release Fixed
|
1.4.2(mantis)
|
|
State
|
10-Fix Delivered,
request for enhancement
|
|
Priority:
|
4-Low
|
|
Related Bugs
|
|
|
Submit Date
|
18-SEP-2002
|
|
Description
|
Implemented as suggested.
xxxxx@xxxxx 2002-09-29
FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
java version "1.4.1"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1-b21)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1-b21, mixed mode)
FULL OPERATING SYSTEM VERSION :
SunOS phoenix 5.8 Generic_108528-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
Recently I submitted a bug against javadoc that seemed to be
fixed already. Because of the way our build process is
constructed I had the [mistaken] idea I was working against the version
I submitted the bug for.
Therefore I suggest to include the JDK version string in the
HTML comment that is inserted in every javadoc page. That
way if you encounter a problem in javadoc you will know
which version has been responsible for the problem.
Old:
<!-- Generated by javadoc on Tue Sep 17 12:08:08 CEST
2002 -->
New:
<!-- Generated by javadoc (build 1.4.1-b21) on Tue Sep
17 12:08:08 CEST 2002 -->
REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.
(Review ID: 164693)
======================================================================
|
|
Work Around
|
N/A
|
|
Evaluation
|
Seems like a good idea.
Lowering to priority 4, as this is not a high priority request.
xxxxx@xxxxx 2002-09-27
|
|
Comments
|
PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang
|
|
|
 |