Java Solaris Communities Sun Store Join SDN My Profile Why Join?
 
Bug Database
Bug Detail
Quick Lists
Top 25 Bugs
Top 25 RFE's
Recently Closed Bugs
Printable Page Printable Page


Bug Database
Bug ID: 4749707
Votes 0
Synopsis stddoclet: Should include version number (and build) in generated HTML comment
Category doclet:tbd
Reported Against 1.4.1
Release Fixed 1.4.2(mantis)
State 10-Fix Delivered, request for enhancement
Priority: 4-Low
Related Bugs
Submit Date 18-SEP-2002
Description
Implemented as suggested.
 xxxxx@xxxxx  2002-09-29


FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
java version "1.4.1"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1-b21)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1-b21, mixed mode)


FULL OPERATING SYSTEM VERSION :

SunOS phoenix 5.8 Generic_108528-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80

A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
Recently I submitted a bug against javadoc that seemed to be
fixed already. Because of the way our build process is
constructed I had the [mistaken] idea I was working against the version
I submitted the bug for.

Therefore I suggest to include the JDK version string in the
HTML comment that is inserted in every javadoc page. That
way if you encounter a problem in javadoc you will know
which version has been responsible for the problem.

  Old:
    <!-- Generated by javadoc on Tue Sep 17 12:08:08 CEST
2002 -->

New:
    <!-- Generated by javadoc (build 1.4.1-b21) on Tue Sep
17 12:08:08 CEST 2002 -->



REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.
(Review ID: 164693) 
======================================================================
Work Around
N/A
Evaluation
Seems like a good idea.
Lowering to priority 4, as this is not a high priority request.
 xxxxx@xxxxx  2002-09-27
Comments
  
  Include a link with my name & email   


PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang