Submitted On 27-APR-1998
enh
Don't do this, it's a really bad idea! Yes,
multi-run tabs are annoying, but not showing
all the options is even worse than moving them
about when you select them (as Windows does).
If you have so many tabs that you need multiple
rows or a scrollbar, you've gone wrong already
and should think about a different interface.
Submitted On 24-JUN-1998
ascopus
I disagree. Sometimes you need a bunch of tabs.
Yes, it really shouldn't be done, but my app is
a foundation for others to use, and it's not for
me to tell them how to build their screens.
Having some random number of tab rows is very ugly,
and is really troublesome for making sure things
are of a certain size.
Submitted On 19-JUL-1999
hollym
Is this still being considered for a future release? I have some clients
(LARGE company) who would really like this functionality. Anyone have a
workaround?
Submitted On 01-FEB-2001
thetick
I have a component called TabSplitter
(http://javadude.com/tools/tabsplitter) that uses a single
run, but solves the potential scrolling problem easily:
Automatically add a popup-menu to the tabs -- the menu
contains a list of all tabs so you can select the
appropriate tab directly.
In any case, IMHO the single/multi-row should be an option
so that programmers have a choice (and nice programmers
will use a single row ;)
ALSO: In TabSplitter, I provide a +/- button like the
notebook control in OS/2 -- they move you between panels,
scrolling the tabs as needed. This way you can see panels
and move at the same time.
Submitted On 27-AUG-2002
kishorebraj
it is very rare case, when the user will like to see only some
of the tabs. Any way those users can also be not ignored. It
is better if this is an optional part. In other word, if the user
want that can change it dynamically in any application using
swing components whether she/he like to see all the tabs or
scrolled tabs
PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang
|