Submitted On 17-MAY-2001
amenkes
The workaround does not work.
Submitted On 18-MAY-2001
falklanghammer
Paul <Yungching.Young@eng.sun.com> wrote:
--
The evaluation of your bug report has been completed.
The problem you encountered has been noticed by our
engineers,
and they are currently working on it. For more information
about
this issue, you can visit the website at
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/44479
12.html
If you have further information might help investigate this
problem,
please feel free to use our bug submitting page at
http://java.sun.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Thank you for taking the time to report this problem.
Regards,
Paul
----------------- Original Bug Report-------------------
category : java_plugin
subcategory : ocx
release : 1.3
type : bug
synopsis : bugs 4407689 4398868 4424604 closed by mistake
description : java version "1.3.0_02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
1.3.0_02)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.0_02, mixed mode)
Bugs 4407689, 4398868, and 4424604 have been closed by
mistake.
The current minor release 1.3.0_02 breaks the majority of
signed applets out
there (all applets in IE with self-signed signatures), and
the solution
proposed for 1.3.1 will not fix this situation (because
users will see too many
security warnings).
This will have such a tremenduous impact on the image of
Sun as a provider for
enterprise-ready software that the bug needs be re-opened.
It has to stay open until it is clear that all before-
mentioned applets
continue working without causing hot-line support traffic
(because of security
dialogs popping up) when JRE 1.3.1 got installed by some
other web pages.
workaround : .
suggested_val :
cust_name : Falk Langhammer
cust_email : falk@livis.de
jdcid : falklanghammer
keyword : webbug
company : Living Pages Research GmbH
hardware : x86
OSversion : windows_2000
bugtraqID : 0
dateCreated : 2001-05-15 08:20:05.4
dateEvaluated : 2001-05-16 16:11:57.239
Submitted On 08-JUN-2001
RadioActiveMan
When does Sun will include other Root-Certifactes than Thawte- and Verisign-Certificates in cacerts ?
Submitted On 16-JUL-2001
migG
Sun *needs* to have a strategy, and work with various commercial CAs to ensure that the cacerts file
deployed with j2re includes all the really well known ones (not just the few REALLY REALLY well known
ones); i.e. a stragegy somewhat like that used by Netscape or Microsoft in their CA certs database selection
process.
- Mitch @ http://home.istar.ca/~neutron/java.html
Submitted On 04-NOV-2001
gpicron
How much do Sun receive from Verisign for each new object
certificate sold ?
Submitted On 24-APR-2002
mhall119
Having to purchase a certificate from one of Sun's trusted
CA's is an unacceptable solution. I can't justify spending
$400 on a globally accepted certificate for an applet that
will run only on our company's intranet. This is not a
solution at all, this is just forcing people to spend more
money than they should. If you don't allow the Java Plug-
in to install new CA's through a web interface, Java is
going to be replaced by a technology that does.
Submitted On 06-SEP-2002
vkt061176
Is this really fixed (JDK 1.3.1_04) ?
Submitted On 16-JAN-2003
20after4
this is about enough to turn me away from java
Submitted On 20-JUN-2005
harmmeijer
Bla bla $400 bla bla Intranet.
You should talk to your administrators and have a a decent set up of the jre.
Using policy on your intranet and your own keystore for authentication.
I was quite unhappy to see the default SUN jre installation
let the user trust whatever it opens. An avarige user has
problems to find the "no" button.
PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang
|