pwd-------------------------------------------------------
test:		runtime/threads/ThreadInterruptedAndNotified
testbase:	testbase_vm
JDK:		mantis b14
System:		RH7.2 ia64
VM:		Server
Mode:		Xmixed, Xcomp
-------------------------------------------------------
This test FAILED with mantis b11 on lin64
This test PASSED with mantis b14 on solaris 5.8 (x86), RH8.0(32bit), winXP64

The point of this test is that if two (or more) threads are
waiting on the same  customer  and one of them is simultaneously notified
and interrupted then the notification should be passed to one of
the other waiting threads.

Steps to reproduce 
================ 
1. cd /net/sqesvr.sfbay/export/vsn/GammaBase/Bugs/{BugID} 
2. sh rerun.sh 

N/A

This test segv'ed on a dual processor itanium 1 using the kernel with the
MP problem.  Using the latest HP kernel caused it to print

Interrupt did not redirect notification.

which is still wrong.  The latter also happens on both single and dual processor
itanium 2's.

  xxxxx@xxxxx   2003-02-03

This test fails with b11, contrary to the description.

  xxxxx@xxxxx   2003-02-03


THe test also fails with b11.  It's a typo to the description.
I update it now.  thks,


  xxxxx@xxxxx   2003-02-03

With the patched MP kernel, the test now always produces
 
 	Interrupt did not redirect notification.
 	
Looking at ThreadInterruptedAndNotified.java (attached), this is a perfectly
legitimate result.  I.e., it's certainly possible for the interrupt
to be delivered an instance of the Notified class _after_ a notify.
In that case, the Notifier won't see the interrupt.

I tested this by commenting out the System.exit() after the
println that produces the above msg.  The test ran to completion and
printed PASS.

Hung Nguyen, the bug submitter, agrees, so I'm marking this bug NR.
I understand we're in the process of upgrading test machine kernels.
Without the kernel fix, this test will still fail.

  xxxxx@xxxxx   2003-02-05