Submitted On 11-APR-2003
martinm1000
What version number is Tiger ?
I Hope this is 1.4.2, because that's really a problem for
customers. In previous versions, our application would not
be started until the desktop dialog has been deal with.
I really hope you will fix it so it behave the same.
We must at all cost avoid customer call to their help
center... And trust me, those customer call for less than
this ;-)
Submitted On 21-MAY-2003
64chuck
I hope this problem gets fixed for 1.4.2 because it will prevent
us from upgrading to 1.4.2 if it is not fixed.
Submitted On 27-JUN-2003
martinm1000
Sorry 64chuck, this hasn't been fixed in 1.4.2...
Submitted On 06-JUL-2003
Benny.Ng
Can you include this in 1.4.2_02 or 1.4.2_03, instead of Tiger?
Submitted On 09-JUL-2003
brendon9x
The real problem here is the Java Webstart team is now being
punished for using a shared VM before the Isolation API is
ready. Using a shared VM was always way too ambitious for
my liking. A noble cause for sure, but the risks inherent in
running JWS in the same VM are too large as demonstrated by
this problem (and it is a huge problem, half the webstart apps
I've tried today failed). The risks are even greater with a
Swing App as there is only one event dispatcher between two
apps.
For anyone else out there that wants to change their JNLP to
work around this madness, try forcing the app to use 1.4.1.
This will force JWS to spawn a new VM which will have its
own dispatch thread.
It might be worth asking Sun if they have any undocumented
flags/tags to prevent JWS from sharing a VM with your app.
Submitted On 09-JUL-2003
nadenn
Please fix this. Webstart is great, but its advantage is
lost if customers have to wait additional 8 seconds before
they can log in the application. I plan to install a
webstart intranet app in 4 weeks, please fix this within
this time.
Submitted On 25-JUL-2003
osbald
We have even worse problems caused by this, our app starts
with a modal login dialog - when this clashes with the desktop
integration dialog the latter pops to the front. This obscures
the our login dialog completely and is also inoperable; in that
none of the buttons work, nor can the integration dialog be
minimised nor moved. After messing with the task manager to
hide the frozen integration one we can proceed to login, but
when then our main app appears it is now disabled and the
hidden integration dialog is now active.. so when have to
hunt for this dialog and accept/dismiss it before user can run
the app.. Of couse we can't allow users to upgrade to 1.4.2
with this kind of bug.
Submitted On 31-JUL-2003
martinm1000
Fixed ? Well please back-port this fix for the next 1.4.2
revision please !
Submitted On 01-AUG-2003
nadenn
My customer has just ordered an update for 1.4.2 and
webstart that should be installed on september the 1st. But
I don't know how to go on without a fix for the conflict
between modal login dialog and desktop integration popup. If
tiger is higher than 1.4.2.x it doesn't help for me. Please
apply the fix to 1.4.2.x to save my work.
Submitted On 01-AUG-2003
mthreat
I hope the workaround "configure desktop integration as
'allways' or 'Never'" isn't the "fix". It is still broken
for people who don't want to configure desktop integration
as "always" or "never".
Submitted On 04-AUG-2003
martinm1000
I posted a solution to this thread:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=38&thread=430741
(snip)
* The workaround is activated for 8 seconds if Java WebStart
1.4.2
* is detected. After 8 seconds it will deactivate itself if
it is
* still active. In that time frame, if a WindowEvent about the
* Desktop Integration Window is intercepted, the window
will be disposed.
(snip)
Submitted On 08-AUG-2003
nadenn
Hi Martin, Thanks for your bugfix class WorkAround4845341().
It looks great, so I have integrated it and had a try.
It shows
WA4845341: Detected Java WebStart 1.4.2
WA4845341: Started.
... 8 seconds
WA4845341: Stopped.
as expected. Nevertheless the desktop integration popup
appears - around 1 second after the message "WA4845341:
Started." I have difficulties to understand this. I thought
there is only one event queue...
Submitted On 08-AUG-2003
martinm1000
Hi nadenn,
Lets continue this discussion on the forum :
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=38&thread=430741
Submitted On 13-AUG-2003
nadenn
If you have fixed the bug why don't you don't you apply the
fix to software thats available. If you want to have success
with java fix the bugs and don't develop only for the
future. Why do I develop in java at all if it promises much
- but fails. And: this problem is not "easy to work around".
Waiting additional 8 seconds is not acceptable if a fast
application startup is needed.
PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang
|