Java Solaris Communities Sun Store Join SDN My Profile Why Join?
 
Bug Database
Bug Detail
Quick Lists
Top 25 Bugs
Top 25 RFE's
Recently Closed Bugs
Printable Page Printable Page


Bug Database
Bug ID: 4852638
Votes 0
Synopsis [1.4.1_01-b01] Core dumps within 5 min with 7.0 EE App server
Category hotspot:compiler2
Reported Against 1.4.1_01
Release Fixed
State 11-Closed, duplicate of 4682728, bug
Priority: 1-Very High
Related Bugs 4682728
Submit Date 23-APR-2003
Description
While running iMM application with EE app server and 1.4.1_01-b01 JDK we get core dumps withing 5 mins.

Here is the stack trace :
  xxxxx@xxxxx   (  xxxxx@xxxxx  ) terminated by signal ABRT (Abort)
0xfe29d998: __lwp_kill+0x0008:  bgeu,a  __lwp_kill+0x1c
(/usr/dist/pkgs/forte_dev,v6.2/SUNWspro/bin/../WS6U2/bin/sparcv9/dbx) where
current thread:   xxxxx@xxxxx  
=>[1] __lwp_kill(0x0, 0x6, 0x0, 0xfe2ba000, 0x7ce, 0x0), at 0xfe29d998
  [2] raise(0x6, 0x0, 0x729fdaa8, 0x0, 0x103598, 0x729fdbc0), at 0xfe24c804
  [3] abort(0x0, 0x729fdb38, 0x0, 0xfffffff8, 0x0, 0x729fdb61), at 0xfe2357
b0
  [4] os::abort(0x1, 0xfd9c35f8, 0x729fe3c0, 0xfd96adb0, 0xfd96ad4e, 0xff00
), at 0xfd8809c0
  [5] report_error(0x729fe3d8, 0xea4, 0xfd9db884, 0xe8, 0xfd90af8c, 0xfd90c
963), at 0xfd78c89c
  [6] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x0, 0x0, 0x978ec0, 0x2a, 0x729ff454, 0x0), at 0xfd5153
60
  [7] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f00a0, 0x6f00a0, 0x28, 0x14, 0x1c), at 0xfd5154
3c
  [8] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f0190, 0x6f0190, 0x26, 0xfd986000, 0x97bfd5), a
t 0xfd51543c
  [9] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f0280, 0x6f0280, 0x24, 0x14, 0x97c395), at 0xfd
51543c
  [10] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f031c, 0x6f031c, 0x22, 0x14, 0x1c), at 0xfd515
43c
  [11] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f0410, 0x6f0410, 0x20, 0xfd986000, 0x1c), at 0
xfd51543c
  [12] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f04ac, 0x6f04ac, 0x1e, 0x0, 0x11d28fd), at 0xf
d51543c
  [13] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f05f0, 0x6f05f0, 0x1c, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xfd51543
c
  [14] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f068c, 0x6f068c, 0x1a, 0x729ff454, 0x0), at 0x
fd51543c
  [15] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x979538, 0x979538, 0x19, 0x14, 0x1c), at 0xfd515
43c
  [16] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f07c4, 0x6f07c4, 0x18, 0xfd986000, 0x97bfd5),
at 0xfd5153dc
  [17] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f08b4, 0x6f08b4, 0x16, 0x14, 0x97c395), at 0xf
d51543c
  [18] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f0950, 0x6f0950, 0x14, 0x14, 0x1c), at 0xfd515
43c
  [19] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x0, 0x6f0a44, 0x12, 0xfd986000, 0x1c), at 0xfd51
543c
  [20] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f0c08, 0x6f0c08, 0x10, 0x0, 0x11d28fd), at 0xf
d51543c
  [21] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6f0ca4, 0x6f0ca4, 0xe, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xfd51543c
  [22] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6ef4b0, 0x6ef4b0, 0xc, 0x729ff454, 0x0), at 0xf
d51543c
  [23] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6ef5f4, 0x6ef5f4, 0x8, 0x14, 0x1c), at 0xfd5154
3c
  [24] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x978534, 0x978534, 0x7, 0xfd986000, 0x97bfd5), a
t 0xfd51543c
  [25] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x6ef6d0, 0x6ef6d0, 0x4, 0x14, 0x97c395), at 0xfd
51543c
  [26] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x978b00, 0x978b00, 0x3, 0x14, 0x1c), at 0xfd5154
3c
  [27] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x1, 0x8f8ffc, 0x8f8ffc, 0x2, 0xfd986000, 0x1c), at 0x
fd5153dc
  [28] PhaseCFG::DFS(0x0, 0x0, 0x8f8cd0, 0x1, 0x0, 0x11d28fd), at 0xfd51543
c
  [29] PhaseCFG::Dominators(0x11d28f4, 0x0, 0xfd9cdf70, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0), at
0xfd5e6144
  [30] Compile::Code_Gen(0x729ff540, 0x729ff314, 0x729ff454, 0x52c368, 0x72
9ff454, 0x0), at 0xfd5e7aa8
  [31] Compile::Compile(0xec1d14, 0x612384, 0x0, 0x7cf0a8, 0xffffffff, 0x1)
, at 0xfd617410
  [32] C2Compiler::compile_method(0x98360, 0x729ffd38, 0x0, 0x7cf0a8, 0xfff
fffff, 0x0), at 0xfd613e2c
  [33] CompileBroker::invoke_compiler_on_method(0x26b, 0x0, 0xffffffff, 0x4
d5ecc, 0xfd9c5074, 0x4d5e40), at 0xfd61366c
  [34] CompileBroker::compiler_thread_loop(0x4d5e40, 0x4d5e40, 0x48a9c8, 0x
4d63e0, 0x301d38, 0xfd6841b0), at 0xfd6cb3e0
  [35] JavaThread::run(0x4d5e40, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xfd6841d8
  [36] _start(0x4d5e40, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xfd680624


  xxxxx@xxxxx   2003-04-23
  xxxxx@xxxxx   2003-04-23
Work Around
N/A
Evaluation
  xxxxx@xxxxx   2003-04-25

This may be a duplicate of 4682728.  I've added the path to a webrev in its 
suggested fix section.  It is also possible that this occurs due to unverified 
bytecodes, several similar problems were helped by using -verify on 
the command-line.

Please confirm status with 1.4.2_beta.
-----
Comments
  
  Include a link with my name & email   


PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang