|
Quick Lists
|
|
Bug ID:
|
6225071
|
|
Votes
|
0
|
|
Synopsis
|
DOC: VetoableChangeSupport.getVetoableChangeListeners: unspecified when no listenears are registered
|
|
Category
|
java:classes_beans
|
|
Reported Against
|
|
|
Release Fixed
|
7(b22)
|
|
State
|
11-Closed,
Verified,
bug
|
|
Priority:
|
3-Medium
|
|
Related Bugs
|
6592570
|
|
Submit Date
|
03-FEB-2005
|
|
Description
|
The behavior of both getVetoableChangeListeners(String propertyName) and getVetoableChangeListeners() is unsrecified when no listeners are registered for this customer .
Similar methods in java.awt classes (Container.getContainerListeners and others) mentions something like "Returns: ... an empty array if no container listeners are currently registered". Similar wording should be added to these two methods specifications.
xxxxx@xxxxx 2005-2-03 14:33:40 GMT
|
|
Work Around
|
N/A
|
|
Evaluation
|
getVetoableChangeListeners(String propertyName) has already been clearly documented (as part of 4985020). getVetoableChangeListeners() should say something about what it will return if there are no listeners (empty array).
xxxxx@xxxxx 2005-2-03 16:46:42 GMT
We should add similar wording to getVetoableChangeListeners().
xxxxx@xxxxx 2005-04-20 14:25:52 GMT
Contribution forum : https://jdk-collaboration.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectForumMessageView?forumID=1463&messageID=15001
(Three related bug-IDs: 4994635, 5026703, 6225071)
Posted Date : 2006-08-24 20:29:46.0
Classes PropertyChangeSupport and VetoableChangeSupport are similar.
So the PropertyChangeSupport.getPropertyChangeListeners() method
and the VetoableChangeSupport.getVetoableChangeListeners() method
should have similar documentation.
Posted Date : 2007-08-13 13:24:40.0
|
|
Comments
|
PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang
|
|
|
|
