Submitted On 18-AUG-2005
can I vote a negative one for this bug? I think this bug is groundbreakingly idiotic.
Submitted On 16-DEC-2005
DevJosh
This is excellent. There are plenty of cases where the line between a client and a server is blurred and where light-weight HTTP server features are needed outside of the J2EE container. This will be very helpful.
Submitted On 23-FEB-2006
Igor_Zhukovsky
A light-weight HTTP server can be implemented with a several custom classes. It's unnecessary to overload the API with such specific features.
Submitted On 18-OCT-2006
mlk
No need for this. I also vote negative.
Submitted On 08-NOV-2006
gregohr
Me too. Negative.
Submitted On 11-JAN-2007
Jetty anyone?
http://www.mortbay.org/
I vote Neegative
Submitted On 24-FEB-2007
dickbeck
And while you are at it, how about an SPI for accounts payable. I vote no - make the API smaller and faster and good on multiprocessors, it has enough features.
Submitted On 24-FEB-2007
dickbeck
And while you are at it, how about an SPI for accounts payable. I vote no - make the API smaller and faster and good on multiprocessors, it has enough features.
PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang
|
