Java Solaris Communities Sun Store Join SDN My Profile Why Join?
 
Bug Database
Bug Detail
Quick Lists
Top 25 Bugs
Top 25 RFE's
Recently Closed Bugs
Printable Page Printable Page


Bug Database
Bug ID: 6503017
Votes 0
Synopsis assert(fr().is_deoptimized_frame(),"frame must be scheduled for deoptimization")
Category hotspot:compiler2
Reported Against
Release Fixed hs10(b06), 6u4(b03) (Bug ID:2171894) , 7(b06) (Bug ID:2176824)
State 10-Fix Delivered, bug
Priority: 2-High
Related Bugs
Submit Date 11-DEC-2006
Description
Nightly test of this test 

nsk.jdwp.StackFrame.SetValues.setvalues001

failed after patchless deopt was putback.
Posted Date : 2006-12-11 13:50:44.0

From the putback comment:

This was caused by patchless deopt. Basically when the setvalue code is used
for a compiled frame it deopts it so that the debuggers can see (and set) the
locals in the interpreter frame. The assert fired because the compiled vframe
was the the frame before the deopt occurred. The code actually worked fine but
the assert I put in to be sure that we deopted before trying to set the values
fired. The fix is to re-read the frame after the deopt is scheduled.
Posted Date : 2007-01-17 21:18:50.0
Work Around
N/A
Evaluation
From the putback comment:

This was caused by patchless deopt. Basically when the setvalue code is used
for a compiled frame it deopts it so that the debuggers can see (and set) the
locals in the interpreter frame. The assert fired because the compiled vframe
was the the frame before the deopt occurred. The code actually worked fine but
the assert I put in to be sure that we deopted before trying to set the values
fired. The fix is to re-read the frame after the deopt is scheduled.
Posted Date : 2007-01-17 21:18:50.0
Comments
  
  Include a link with my name & email   


PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang