|
Quick Lists
|
|
Bug ID:
|
6651382
|
|
Votes
|
0
|
|
Synopsis
|
The Java JVM SNMP provider reports incorrect stats when asked for multiple OIDs
|
|
Category
|
java:classes_management
|
|
Reported Against
|
|
|
Release Fixed
|
7(b25),
6u10(b13) (Bug ID:2158998)
|
|
State
|
10-Fix Delivered,
bug
|
|
Priority:
|
2-High
|
|
Related Bugs
|
|
|
Submit Date
|
16-JAN-2008
|
|
Description
|
The Java JVM SNMP provider reports incorrect stats when asked for multiple OIDs within JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB::jvmMemPoolUsed and JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB::jvmMemPoolMaxSize. I've traced this as far as something within Java_sun_management_MemoryPoolImpl_getUsage0 within libmanagement, but that's as far as I was able to take it.
Good results via snmpwalk example:
snmpwalk -v2c -cremovedpw 127.0.0.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.145.3.163.1.1.2.110.1.11
JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB::jvmMemPoolUsed.1 = Counter64: 13562176 bytes
JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB::jvmMemPoolUsed.2 = Counter64: 100364776 bytes
JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB::jvmMemPoolUsed.3 = Counter64: 3451328 bytes
JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB::jvmMemPoolUsed.4 = Counter64: 378413648 bytes
JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB::jvmMemPoolUsed.5 = Counter64: 44289744 bytes
Now, when you query multiple OIDs at once, the JVM "sticks" on the first value it looked up and returns it for all data points:
Bad results via requesting multiple OIDs:
snmpget -v2c -cremovedpw 127.0.0.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.145.3.163.1.1.2.110.1.11.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.145.3.163.1.1.2.110.1.11.2 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.145.3.163.1.1.2.110.1.11.3 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.145.3.163.1.1.2.110.1.11.4 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.145.3.163.1.1.2.110.1.11.5
JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB::jvmMemPoolUsed.1 = Counter64: 13562176 bytes
JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB::jvmMemPoolUsed.2 = Counter64: 13562176 bytes
JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB::jvmMemPoolUsed.3 = Counter64: 13562176 bytes
JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB::jvmMemPoolUsed.4 = Counter64: 13562176 bytes
JVM-MANAGEMENT-MIB::jvmMemPoolUsed.5 = Counter64: 13562176 bytes
I've seen this problem for both the JvmMemPoolUsed and jvmMemPoolMaxSize tree, but it may exist for other components.
The java version is:
java version "1.6.0_03"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_03-b05)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_03-b05, mixed mode, sharing)
The problem was first noticed when we tried to gather these stats for the first time from the JVM. Other SNMP stats provided by the JVM are working for us.
Posted Date : 2008-01-16 22:57:00.0
.
Posted Date : 2008-01-30 15:46:02.0
The following nightly tests are affected by this bug:-
closed/sun/management/snmp/jvmMemory/JvmMemPoolTest.sh
sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/JvmstatCountersTest.java
Also include the non-closed name for the test just in case
it ever moves:
sun/management/snmp/jvmMemory/JvmMemPoolTest.sh
Posted Date : 2008-04-10 20:20:38.0
|
|
Work Around
|
send one SNMP request per memory pool
|
|
Evaluation
|
This is indeed a bug.
The culprit seems to be:
sun/management/snmp/jvminstr/JvmMemPoolEntryImpl.java
This class uses the keys 'memoryTag', 'peakMemoryTag' and
'collectMemoryTag' to cache the memory Usage, memory PeakUsage,
and memory CollectionUsage in the request-contextual cache - but
these keys do not contain any instance (=line) identification.
As a result all the lines in the table will use the same key, which is wrong.
The fix is quite simple.
I believe the methods getMemoryUsage(), getPeakMemoryUsage(), and
getCollectMemoryUsage() should use a key composed of:
memoryTag+"."+jvmMemPoolIndex,
peakMemoryTag+"."+jvmMemPoolIndex,
collectMemoryTag+"."+jvmMemPoolIndex
instead.
What happens is that since the key doesn't contain the index id,
the first data which is put into the cache is returned for all
the lines, since all the lines are using the same keys.
Each line should use its own key, and the way it's done elsewhere
in the code is by appending "." + the value of the index to the common
root. If I'm not mistaken that's the root of the bug.
The only methods that should need to change are the method which use the
memoryTag, peakMemoryTag, and collectMemoryTag variables, and I believe
only the three methods getMemoryUsage(), getPeakMemoryUsage(), and
getCollectMemoryUsage() are concerned by this.
It would be good to check whether the other XXXXXEntryImpl classes
in the jvminstr package also have these bug.
I suspect that any table entry representing an MXBean exposing a
complex attribute (like MemoryUsage) will have this bug - they're
all built on the same model.
Posted Date : 2008-01-24 18:52:12.0
|
|
Comments
|
PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang
|
|
|
 |